• About   |
  • Submit Guest Post |
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Second Angle (TSA Magazine)
Advertise
  • Infotainment
    • Sports
    • People
    • Inspiring
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
    • Home & Decoration
  • Buzz
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology
The Second Angle
No Result
View All Result
  • Infotainment
  • Entertainment
  • Buzz
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

Daughters are Equal to Sons after Sixty Four Years

Hazaqat Zubana by Hazaqat Zubana
August 12, 2020
in News, Social Issues
Daughters are Equal to Sons after Sixty Four Years

Representative Image

1
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsApp
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 stated that only sons had the right to inherit ancestral property while the daughters had no share in accordance with Hindu Law. Moreover, once the daughter was married she was no longer considered a member of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and all her claims to property ceased to exist.

On September 9, 2005, the Hindu Succession Act was amended, and the daughters were recognized as coparceners and their marital status made no difference to their claim in their father’s property. Additionally, a daughter gained equal shares in the property which was accrued to them by birth.

On August 11, 2020, the question that urged the Supreme Court was, “Does the Hindu Succession (Amendment) ACT, 2005 which gave equal rights to daughters in ancestral property, have a retrospective effect?”

The apex court of India ruled that women have an equal right to a share in the HUF property, regardless of their time of birth, thus, clearing a fifteen-year long dispute which led to lower courts making conflicting decisions.

daughters
Credit: leggerhythms.org

Justices Arun Mishra, S. Abdul Nazeer, and M.R. Shah comprised the bench which ruled this landmark judgement.

The bench stated that the provisions made under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 conferred that the daughter born before or after the amendment is a coparcener in the same way as a son would be with equal rights and liabilities.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta who led the dispute representing the Union Government said that “The Amendment Act, 2005 is not retrospective but retroactive in operation since it enables the daughters to exercise their coparcenary rights on the commencement of the Amendment Act.”

This judgement has settled the long dispute which arose in the daughters’ right to property.

The bench has requested the courts concerned to resolve the pending cases within six months.

The exclusion of daughters from the property which was rightfully theirs by birth was plain discrimination and resulted in the oppression of women for decades. This historic judgement is surely going to strengthen women and their fundamental rights and gave women the justice that was long overdue.

[zombify_post]

Tags: #2020#fundamentalrightsIndiastory
Previous Post

Downpour in South Korea: A Warning to be Heeded

Next Post

Youth: Global Action Force

Hazaqat Zubana

Hazaqat Zubana

Next Post
Youth: Global Action Force

Youth: Global Action Force

Important Links

  • About
  • Guest Post
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter

© 2017-23. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved. Developed and Managed by SquareBase.io

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Infotainment
    • Sports
    • People
    • Inspiring
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
    • Home & Decoration
  • Buzz
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology

© 2017-23. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved. Developed and Managed by SquareBase.io

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.