• About   |
  • Write For Us   |
  • Contact Us   |
  • हिंदी
Friday, July 1, 2022
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
The Second Angle
NEWSLETTER
  • Opinion
  • TSA Analysis
  • Explainers
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • People
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Environment
  • Technology
  • World
The Second Angle
  • Opinion
  • TSA Analysis
  • Explainers
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • People
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Environment
  • Technology
  • World
Home Explainers

Centre proposes the struck down section 66A, in cybercrime proposal at UN: Why this Reintroduction?

In its proposals for the cybersecurity convention at the United Nations, the Modi government included the same section, with the exact same wording as section 66A of the IT Act which was struck down by the supreme court in 2015.

TSA Desk by TSA Desk
June 14, 2022
in Explainers
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
section 66A
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsApp

Seven years ago, section 66A of the IT Act was struck down in 2015 as unconstitutional. Now, the union government has included the same section, with the exact same wording, in its proposals to the UN. Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 made it a punishable offence for any person to send ‘grossly offensive’ or ‘menacing’ information using a computer resource or communication device.

By the judgement of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in 2015, on the issue of online speech and intermediary liability in India this act was taken down and considered unconstitutional on grounds of violating the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. 

RelatedPosts

Explained: What is the reason for street protests against the new Agnipath scheme?

Explained: What is the reason for street protests against the new Agnipath scheme?

June 17, 2022
Why has the I & B ministry prohibited the promotion of online betting platforms?

Why has the I & B ministry prohibited the promotion of online betting platforms?

June 15, 2022

Further, it was also made clear that online intermediaries would only be obligated to take down content on receiving an order from a court or government authority. The case is considered a watershed moment for online free speech in India. The vague and arbitrary terms used in the Section led to much misuse of the act both in personal and political nature, with several criminal cases being instituted against people in instances of online speech, including political commentary and humour. Section 66A and 79 of the IT Act, as well as rules made under this Act, created a hard liability for internet intermediaries.

India’s submission to the cybersecurity convention at the United Nations said, “Each state party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as are necessary to establish as an offence under its domestic law,  if any person sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character” which clearly has the same wordings as the section 66A. 

section 66a
Image Source: National Herald India

India regularly suffers from a wide variety of cybercrimes. Cybercrimes cost the global economy hundreds of billions of dollars every year. A legal basis for preventing them can be provided by this convention of the UN. But the Modi government is trying to bring restrictions on online speech freedom through the backdoor using this. While the Ministry of External Affairs did not respond to queries about the proposal, the legal thinking behind the move may be to defy the apex court and to make sure that if the restrictions pass muster at the UN that India now has an ‘international obligation’ to reintroduce this section.

“It is beyond shocking that the government is trying to introduce Section 66A through backdoor legislation. Is the government sending a message to the Supreme Court or to constitutional law experts or to freedom of speech supporters or to everyone, that the government will do what it thinks appropriate, regardless of what the Constitution and the Courts may say” Justice Madan B. Lokur, a former judge of the Supreme Court, said to the press. 

“It is unusual to see the Indian government submit a struck down provision such as this at an international forum, this marks a departure from its stance on Section 66A back home”, said Krishnesh Bapat, Associate Litigation Counsel at the Internet Freedom Foundation. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Salman Waris, Managing Partner at TechLegis Advocates and Solicitors stated “For the provision to be struck down was not in the best interests of the government, the present effort to reintroduce it at the international level means that if this becomes part of an international treaty [and India ratifies it], it may give the government an excuse to reintroduce the law nationally on the pretext of meeting international treaty obligations”, analysing union ministry’s move forward with reintroducing the struck down act.

He also said that “A new law is needed that protects the interests of intermediary platforms where such speech is made, but it should also ensure that no Indian’s Fundamental Rights are harmed. In any case, you don’t need a provision as broad as Section 66A to counteroffensive speech online”.

section 66A
Image Source: The Logical Indian

Even Though India has proposed this already discarded act, Nigeria, Luxembourg, Georgia, El Salvador, the European Union, and the United Kingdom opposed it with some of them specifically noting that it would impact freedom of speech in their countries. 

There is a rising concern among international civil society that a treaty or a convention to counter cybercrime would significantly risk individual rights and freedom of speech. “A binding international treaty has the potential to expand government regulation of online content and reshape law enforcement access to data in a way that could criminalize free expression and undermine privacy,” said Human Rights Watch’s Deborah Brown in an online essay last year, which is the suspected main agenda of resurrecting a struck down law.

Also Read: Rajya Sabha elections over after allegations of horse-trading, misconduct and breach of voting rules

Author

  • section 66A
    TSA Desk

    View all posts

ShareSendTweet

Subscribe to our Push Notifications to get the news delivered to you directly before anyone else.

Unsubscribe
TSA Desk

TSA Desk

Related Posts

Explained: What is the reason for street protests against the new Agnipath scheme?
Explainers

Explained: What is the reason for street protests against the new Agnipath scheme?

June 17, 2022

The two prime reasons for protests are job security and pension.

Read more
Why has the I & B ministry prohibited the promotion of online betting platforms?
Explainers

Why has the I & B ministry prohibited the promotion of online betting platforms?

June 15, 2022

The statement, which asked all broadcasters to follow the guidelines, stated that no gaming ad should show a person under...

Read more
Government limits misleading commercials and forbids surrogate advertisements
Explainers

Government limits misleading commercials and forbids surrogate advertisements

June 12, 2022

Surrogate advertisement, according to the standards, is an advertisement for a product or service whose advertising is otherwise illegal or...

Read more
section 66A
Explainers

Texas school shooting: What Happened in Uvalde?

June 11, 2022

People and media are blaming the late action of police for the incident in Uvalde's Robb Elementary School on May...

Read more
Controversial remarks on Prophet Mohammed: Heavy backlash from Islamic countries
Explainers

Controversial remarks on Prophet Mohammed: Heavy backlash from Islamic countries

June 7, 2022

On May 1st, BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma made controversial remarks about the Prophet Mohammed on a program at Delhi University....

Read more
Tiananmen Square massacre: China still doesn’t wish to talk about it
Explainers

Tiananmen Square massacre: China still doesn’t wish to talk about it

June 6, 2022

What exactly was the Tiananmen Square massacre, and what caused it?

Read more
Load More
Next Post
Protests and arrests in Uttar Pradesh: CM Yogi's bulldozer raze continues

Protests and arrests in Uttar Pradesh: CM Yogi's bulldozer raze continues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Twitter Instagram Telegram

About

The Second Angle

A platform providing diverse views on various issues, providing an in-depth understanding of important developments happening around us. It offers you true journalism amidst the cacophony. Discover the latest news, opinions, analysis and a lot more here.

Important Links

  • About
  • Career
  • Write for us | The Second Angle
  • Support Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • हिंदी

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

© 2017-22. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
  • TSA Analysis
  • Explainers
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • People
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Environment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2017-22. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.