• About   |
  • Submit Guest Post |
  • Contact Us   |
Thursday, June 1, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Second Angle
Advertise
  • Infotainment
    • Sports
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
      • Home & Decoration
  • People
    • Inspiring
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology
  • World
The Second Angle
  • Infotainment
  • Entertainment
  • People
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology
  • World
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
Home offbeat

Philosophy in Action: How Positivism Seeks Truth

The beginning of a new philosophical movement, positivism, was founded by Auguste Comte in 1830. For more than a century, supporters of this current were looking for exact methods of knowledge of the world and the achievement of actual knowledge.

Jeanna Bray by Jeanna Bray
April 15, 2022
in offbeat
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Philosophy in Action: How Positivism Seeks Truth
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsApp
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

The beginning of a new philosophical movement, positivism, was founded by Auguste Comte in 1830. For more than a century, supporters of this current were looking for exact methods of knowledge of the world and the achievement of actual knowledge. Representatives of four generations of positivism under the influence of exact sciences tried to create a scientific philosophy. In this article, professional writing services provide you with a scientific definition of positivist philosophy and its formative stages.

1. Chronology

In the history of philosophy, it is customary to distinguish four main currents of positivism, which were logical extensions of each other:

RelatedPosts

casino

Comparing the Most Popular Casino Card Games

casino

Chemical Engineer Reflects on Introduction to Bitcoin Infrastructure Course

  • The first (classical) positivism, the 1830s;
  • The second positivism (empiriocriticism and Machismo) of the 1890s;
  • neopositivism (logical positivism) in the 1920s;
  • Postpositivism (critical rationalism), the 1960s.

Each of these currents either complemented Auguste Comte’s principles of cognition (second positivism), singled out a specific tool and tried to improve it (as neopositivism tried to create an “ideal language” of science), or critically reconsidered the fundamental principles of positivism and changed its worldview perspective (post-positivism).

2. Positivism vs. Idealism

According to positivist philosophy, Truth was the accumulation and systematization of accurate knowledge about social processes. Knowledge was considered reliable if it was confirmed as true by experience. If knowledge was not confirmed by experiment, then it wasn’t very sensible from the point of view of scientific philosophy.Philosophy in Action: How Positivism Seeks Truth

The research focus of positivism was on the study of real social processes. Positivists rejected the possibility of studying the causes of phenomena and preferred a static description of objects.

The main reason for the emergence of positivist “pure scientific cognition” were important changes – the development of the exact sciences and the industrial revolution.

3. Second-generation positivism: deepening knowledge

Second, positivism transformed the ideas of O. Comte. In science, this generation of positivists is commonly referred to as “Machismo” or “empire criticism.” The first name appeared because of the great contribution of the Austrian physicist-philosopher Ernst Mach, and the second because of a new critical reinterpretation of empirical experience.

Machists deepened their subject matter and made it acceptable to other disciplines. The reasons for the emergence of second positivism in the late 19th century are best explained by the thesis of the mathematician Henri Poincaré: progress in science can expose even fundamental principles to danger. It happened to positivist knowledge as well: it had to be revised.

Philosophy in Action: How Positivism Seeks Truth
image source: reprac

The truth of the second positivism changed its quality: Machismo formed an understanding of the importance of the final product (exact knowledge) and perfected a critical analysis of the resulting knowledge (the mechanism of cognition). This form of positivism dealt with the critique of experience. The experience was no longer true in itself but depended on the subjective factors of the researcher, his sensory data, which created laws, formulas, and concepts.

Previously, truth in positivism was in exact static knowledge, which was considered unshakable. But discoveries in mathematics and physics showed the fallacy of this.

If, for the first positivism, the most important factor was to obtain exact knowledge, the second positivism, under the influence of experimental psychology, changed its methodological perspective on the mechanisms of cognition. The method of introspection, the direct observation of the self, could help them.

But the crisis of scientific cognition came after the deepening of knowledge in physics (Newton’s third law no longer worked unconditionally (changing the view of matter due to the discovery of the electron), in mathematics (it was recognized that the Euclidean geometrical system was not unique) and in biology (development of the theory of evolution from Darwin to Spencer convinced of the dynamic nature of processes, not their statism, as the first positivists had believed).

The shift of attention to the study of the subjective senses was influenced by discoveries in the exact sciences and the loss of its universality by mechanistic. Natural processes were now seen as the possibility of multiple systems rather than a singular one.

Whereas the first positivism confronted the conventionality of metaphysical ideas and categorically condemned them using scientific thinking, the second positivism already confronted the conventionality of physical ideas about the world. To recreate the balance, the Machists created the notion of conventionality, “conventionalism,” which became the basis for obtaining true knowledge. Ernst Mach had the greatest influence on the theory of second positivism. He also succeeded in extending the notion of convention from mathematics to the other sciences.

4. Neopositivism and the role of language in science

The followers of neopositivism tried to find the truth of accurate knowledge in the construction of scientific tools through the comprehension of language and its role in transmitting knowledge. In the early 20th century, methods of symbolic logic were successfully used in philosophy and created the third wave of positivism: neo-positivism.

The main focus was now on language as a means of acquiring knowledge. The neo-positivists defined the quality of a scientific statement through the successful verification process using atomic facts. In their view, these atomic facts are directly perceived by man.

Through the invention of precise (formal) language, neopositivists wanted to get rid of the main enemy of their doctrine – metaphysics. And unlike the positivists, the neo-positivists began to neglect the systematization of knowledge (the quantitative aspect) and focused on studying linguistic forms of judgment and categories (the qualitative aspect of knowledge).

Philosophy in Action: How Positivism Seeks Truth
image source: indiatimes

To explain whether the verification of language is true or false, the notion of the demarcation of the boundaries of scientific knowledge – the definition of the framework of scientific and non-scientific thinking – was put forward. The neo-positivists suggested that only within the framework of scientific thinking was it possible to create an ideal language, which would be the main tool for obtaining accurate knowledge.

The development of neopositivism lasted more than half a century. And the study of the logical apparatus had the main goal of clarifying thoughts, eliminating semantic and syntactic ambiguities and nonsense in speech. To check the scientificity of propositions, the neopositivists, as part of the boundary of scientific knowledge, proposed the use of different methods: the principle of verification, semiotic analysis, and later – philological criticism of language.

Many scientific currents emerged and developed based on neopositivism and its interest in language. Most new currents studied the importance of language in understanding reality and its interpretation. Thus, the most striking among them was Richard Rorty’s linguistic turn, which gave rise in the aftermath to a multitude of scientific approaches to working with texts.

But despite its enormous fruits, by the 1950s, neopositivism had failed to meet the main challenges it was working on: not only had the exclusion of metaphysics not been addressed, but it had even been revived with renewed vigor at the end of World War II. Metaphysical questions like “Why did the man do it?” became central to the philosophical discourse of postpositivism and its understanding of scientific thinking.

5. Postpositivism and its critique of positivism

Truth, as understood by the representatives of postpositivism, has less of a connection to the tradition of the early positivists. In the critique of neopositivism and positivism, postpositivism forms its basic principles of developing science and scientific knowledge. The main theses of this current were:

  • since facts need theory, there was a rehabilitation of the theoretical level of scientific thinking;
  • the statement that knowledge is not a static system (the positivists’ version), but a complex causal system of scientific thought development, focused the postpositivists’ attention on studying the development of theories;
  • Postpositivists not only declared that they could not get rid of metaphysics, but they also rehabilitated it as an auxiliary step in the scientific apparatus.

Thus, the main question the postpositivists sought to answer was, “How did a new theory arise?” instead of the positivist question, “How does it exist?” The rehabilitation of metaphysics, the critique of empirical knowledge as reliable, and the appeal to causality made the methodology of postpositivism look little like that of Auguste Comte.

The focus of the new current of positivism lost its unconditional nature, recognizing science as much a convention as any ideology, philosophy, or mythology. The postpositivists also changed their focus and underlying approaches – instead of physics and exact sciences, they sought explanations for understanding the world in the history of science and the cyclical nature of society.

Why did the postpositivists’ worldview change so dramatically? Because their understanding of the world was again strongly influenced by sociocultural conditions in society. If technology had a strong influence on the first positivists, the postpositivists were more impressed by the confusion and disorder of 20th-century modern society – totalitarian regimes, wars, and anti-colonialism.

6. What was the significance of positivism?

The main goal of positivist philosophy–to make scientific thinking precise, without ambiguities and incomprehensible abstract concepts–was never achieved.

Despite the long development of scientific thinking, positivist philosophy has had a tremendous impact on the exact sciences and humanities. Auguste Comte, who first categorized the sciences, defined their subjects and purposes and began forming a methodological basis for each discipline.

Thanks to positivism and its four currents, every science has its methodological apparatus today. But despite the established clear boundaries of each science, the postmodern period became characterized by an interdisciplinary approach to knowledge of the world.

It was postpositivism, which rehabilitated metaphysics and recognized the important supplementary role of philosophy in the production of scientific knowledge, that directly initiated this organic interpenetration of different disciplines.

Bio:

Jeanna Bray is a person who finds the right words and forms of presentation to convey the benefits students receive when they turn to PaperHelp experts for research and writing assistance. Jeanna Bray is upbeat and writes beautiful poetry that she dreams of publishing someday.

Also Checkout: Why Writing Skills Are Essential for Academic World

ShareSendTweet
Jeanna Bray

Jeanna Bray

Related Posts

casino
iGaming

Comparing the Most Popular Casino Card Games

While online casinos may offer an extensive selection of card games, most players tend to focus on the three most...

Read more
casino
Crypto

Chemical Engineer Reflects on Introduction to Bitcoin Infrastructure Course

Mockridge already completed the Introduction to Bitcoin Theory and Bitcoin Development courses and wasted no time to sign up and...

Read more
casino
iGaming

Why Do People Choose pin-up-win.in in India?

Today we will discuss in more detail all the advantages and disadvantages of this platform and explain why most players...

Read more
casino
Education

The Art of Paper Writing – Mastering Research Papers Explained

Master the art of paper writing with this comprehensive guide. Learn how to impress your professor and turn your ideas...

Read more
casino
Sports

The Influence Of Fantasy Football On The NFL: A Look At The Fan Experience

In this article, we'll explore the influence of fantasy football on the NFL fan experience, from the way fans watch...

Read more
casino
offbeat

5 Benefits of Using Steel for Your Self-Storage Facility

Steel has become increasingly popular for self-storage facilities due to its many benefits. This article will discuss the five benefits...

Read more
Load More
Next Post
Web 2.0 VS Web 3.0 - Major Differences You Need To Know

Web 2.0 VS Web 3.0 - Major Differences You Need To Know

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Twitter Instagram Telegram

About

The Second Angle

A platform providing diverse views on various issues, providing an in-depth understanding of important developments happening around us. It offers you true journalism amidst the cacophony. Discover the latest news, opinions, analysis and a lot more here.

Important Links

  • About
  • Career
  • Guest Post
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • हिंदी

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

© 2017-23. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved. Developed and Maintenance by SquareBase.io

No Result
View All Result
  • Infotainment
    • Sports
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
      • Home & Decoration
  • People
    • Inspiring
  • Education
  • Travel
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Technology
  • World
  • Login

© 2017-23. The Second Angle. All Rights Reserved. Developed and Maintenance by SquareBase.io

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.